Search Articles
text
keyword
author
and
or

 
  No 1
  REDIFFERENTIATION THERAPY OF THYROID CANCER  
  Cornelia Schmutzler
Institut für Experimentelle Endokrinologie und Endokrinologisches Forschungs-Centrum der Charité, EnForCé , Charite Hochschulmedizin Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, D-10098 Berlin, Germany ,
email: cornelia.schmutzler@charite.de
Josef Köhrle
Institut für Experimentelle Endokrinologie und Endokrinologisches Forschungs-Centrum der Charité, EnForCé, Charite Hochschulmedizin Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, D-10098 Berlin, Germany , email: josef.koehrle@charite.de

 
     
    printed version  
     
     
  Editorial 2005

Corresponding author’s email address: cornelia.schmutzler@charite.de

Introduction

The classical molecular genetic view of cancer states that carcinogenesis is a multistep process whereby cells accumulate mutations in essential genes that give them growth advantages and finally develop into malignantly transformed cancer cells with the ability to invade neighboring tissues and blood vessels to give rise to metastases [1]. Recently, this view is being complemented by conceding a major role for interactions between tumors and their stromal environment [2] as well as for so-called epigenetic changes, such as histone modification and DNA methylation, that influence gene activity without altering gene sequence [3]. In the course of these events, cells abandon the expression of genes encoding tissue-specific proteins and consequently lose the ability to perform their proper physiological functions, i.e., they undergo de-differentiation. Concerning thyroid cells, this includes, probably due to a deficit in thyroid-specific transcription factors [4-6], the loss of thyroperoxidase (TPO), thyrotropin receptor (TSHr), thyroglobulin (Tg) and, as a comparably early event, of the sodium iodide symporter (NIS) [7] which then also has therapeutic consequences in terms of the feasibility of radioiodide therapy. Also, this process may induce slowly growing thyrocytes, showing only minimal probability to undergo division during their lifetime, to give rise to one of the most aggressive and rapidly proliferating cancers in humans, an anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC) [8].

A recent alternative to cytotoxic drug treatment of cancers is re-differentiation therapy. In case of the thyroid gland this option is tested especially for those cases that do no longer respond to established treatment protocols [9]. Here, it is the aim to reactivate at least some of the features of differentiated cells, e.g. to control rapid tumor growth by stimulating appropriate cell cycle regulation or an adequate level of apoptosis, or to reinduce typical functions, such as radioiodide uptake, being exploitable for treatment. This must again involve changes in gene expression and may be achieved by various types of drugs targeting different, although mutually interdependent, mechanisms of the control of gene activity: 1) by providing transcriptional signals, 2) by influencing the accessibility of genes for the transcriptional machinery or 3) by altering the long-term activation or silencing of genes. As it is of course impossible to revert chromosomal rearrangements, deletions or mutations of essential tumor suppressor or oncogenes, it is the epigenetic level that has become a main focus of re-differentiation therapy. Concerning thyroid carcinomas, all these principles have been applied, either experimentally in vitro and in vivo or in clinical trials, and will be discussed in the following sections.

1) Modulating gene expression using nuclear receptor ligands

Retinoic acid
A class of substances widely utilized for chemoprevention and therapy of hematological and solid tumors are the vitamin A-derived retinoic acids (RA) and some of their synthetic derivatives [10]. RA are key regulators of morphogenesis, proliferation, and differentiation during development and are involved in vision, spermatogenesis and the maintenance of healthy, functional tissues, such as the lung, in the adult. Various effects of RA in cancer cells have been described. They have been shown to affect signaling pathways regulating growth, differentiation and apoptosis via proteins such as AP-1, MAPK, PI3 kinase, Akt, cyclins, cyclin-dependent kinases and their inhibitors, Bcl proteins and caspases [11].
RA exert their effects via nuclear receptors acting as ligand dependent transcription factors. There are two subfamilies of RA receptors, retinoic acid receptors (RAR) which bind all-trans RA and 9-cis RA and retinoid X receptors (RXR) which bind only 9-cis RA. They usually function as RAR-RXR heterodimers and interact with RA response elements in the regulatory region of RA-responsive genes. In the absence of ligand, they recruit so-called co-repressor complexes. These contain histone deacetylase (HDAC) activities which remove acetyl residues from the tails of histones H3 and H4 and thereby induce a compact and closed conformation of the chromatin. In the presence of ligand, nuclear receptors recruit co-activator complexes. These include histone acetyl transferase (HAT) activities adding acetyl residues to histones. This causes an opening of the chromatin making DNA accessible for the transcriptional machinery which then initiates transcription [12]. Necessarily, this is a global process affecting many RA-responsive genes simultaneously. However, as RA-regulated genes are involved in cell cycle regulation and apoptosis, a growth-limiting effect may be the consequence. Moreover, as it is the case in the thyroid gland, therapeutically “useful” genes may be induced (see below).
From that it is evident that cells must have an adequate supply of RARs and RXRs as a prerequisite for RA signal transduction. Several publications report that RARs and RXRs are present in thyroid carcinomas. However, their expression levels may vary between tumor cell lines as well as tumors and control thyroid tissues [13-17]. There may also be a redistribution of the normal nuclear localization of the receptor to the cytoplasm as demonstrated by immunocytochemistry of thyroid carcinoma specimen [17]. Tang et al. [16] reported that loss of mRNA expression for one or more RAR or RXR correlated with increased proliferation and altered histological features of PTC tumors. There may even be an association between the responsiveness of thyroid carcinoma cells to RA and the loss of certain receptor subtypes, namely RXRγ or RARβ [18-20] as only those lines expressing these isoforms exhibit growth reduction after RA treatment. Thus, the RAR/RXR repertoire of thyroid tumors may determine, if they will respond to RA re-differentiation therapy.
Nevertheless, a couple of experimental studies demonstrated that RA treatment can indeed alter the expression of certain differentiation-related markers in thyroid carcinoma cells. These are, among others, Tg [21], ICAM-1 [22], and type I 5’-deiodinase (5’DI) [23,24] which are up-regulated and CD97 [25] and urokinase which are down-regulated [26]. Growth reduction in vitro or in a xenotransplantation model was also observed [19,25]. Most interesting, NIS mRNA expression and activity are increased by RA [27,28], which is due to a RA response element in the human NIS promoter [29]. This is therapeutically promising, as it opens the possibility to treat patients exhibiting non-accumulating tumors or metastases with radioiodide after applying RA. Interestingly, this RA responsiveness is also exhibited by NIS aberrantly overexpressed in the mammary cancer cell line MCF-7 so that NIS is discussed also for radioiodide therapy of breast cancer (reviewed in [30]). Furthermore, a combination between NIS gene therapy and RA differentiation therapy has been considered for the treatment of prostate cancer [31]. 5’DI is a differentiation marker in the thyroid, as 5’DI expression and enzyme activity are high in the healthy gland but progressively lost in thyroid carcinoma in correlation with increasing malignancy. Stimulation of 5’DI mRNA and protein expression as well as enzyme activity was observed in follicular, but not in anaplastic thyroid carcinoma cell lines [23] and, furthermore, in a fine needle aspiration biopsy obtained from a thyroid carcinoma patient treated with RA [32]. A RA responsive element is also present in the 5’DI promoter [33,34].
Several studies have been conducted to elucidate RA effects on thyroid carcinoma in patients. In a multi-center pilot study [35-37], 75 patients with advanced thyroid cancer and without the therapeutic options of operation or radioiodide therapy were treated with 13-cis RA at a dosage of 1.5 mg/kg body weight daily over 5 weeks. Of the 50 patients evaluated, 13 showed a clear increase in radioiodine uptake, and eight a mild increase. Tg levels (a tumor marker for thyroid cancer progression) were unchanged or decreased in 20 patients. Tumor size was assessable in 37 patients; regression was observed in 6, and there was no change in 22. Enhanced glucose uptake into tumors results from anaerobic metabolism and is indicative of rapid malignant growth. Glucose uptake was measured by 18F-FDG PET, and there was an increase after RA in 1, a decrease in 6 and no change in 25 of 32 patients. In total, a response, classified as a reduction of tumor size and/or Tg levels with or without concomitant increase in radioiodide uptake, was observed in 10 of 50 patients; a stabilization of these two parameters was observed in another 9 patients. Response to retinoid therapy did not always correlate with increased radioiodine uptake, so other direct antiproliferative effects had to be assumed. Several other studies with smaller numbers of patients report on similar [38-42] or lower efficiencies [43] of RA with respect to the parameters mentioned. However, therapeutically relevant doses of radioiodide were accumulated by some of the lesions with previously insufficient or absent radioiodide uptake after RA treatment [35,38]. In one study, two of 25 patients were completely free of symptoms after a follow-up of two years [42]. A summary of the various studies is presented in Table 1.

Table1 as PDF

To further elucidate the potential of this therapeutic modality, a multi-center, randomized, prospective phase II/III trial (“MSSR study”) [44] has now started to recruit patients. 120 participants will be enrolled in two arms, one receiving 13-cis RA at 1.5 mg/kg body weight daily for six weeks alone, the other arm ablative 131I -radioiodide therapy in addition. Monitoring will include whole body scan, determination of Tg serum levels, 18F-FDG PET and determination of tumor size.

RA is the only compound discussed for re-differentiation of thyroid cancer for which already therapeutic experience is available from several clinical trials. A couple of other compounds are being evaluated in vitro and in animal models, and so far, some first studies in patients have been initiated. The respective data are reviewed in the following sections.

PPARγ ligands
PPARγ is, like RAR and RXR, a member of the nuclear receptor family. This receptor which functions as a heterodimer with RXR is, above all, known for its role in lipid metabolism and adipocyte differentiation. Its ligands are, on the one hand, natural compounds such as polyunsaturated fatty acids and eicosanoids, on the other hand, synthetic drugs such as glitazones or thiazolidinediones [45]. In the context of thyroid carcinoma, PPARγ came into focus after the description of a chromosomal translocation, t(2;3)(q13;p25), in follicular thyroid carcinomas and later also in follicular thyroid adenomas [46-50]. The product, a fusion protein of thyroid transcription factor PAX8 to peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor &gamma (PPARγ), is a dominant-negative inhibitor of PPARγ signal transduction, accelerates cell proliferation, reduces apoptosis and permits anchorage independent and growth without contact inhibition [46,51], indicating that PPARγ is involved in tumor suppression as well as epithelial differentiation in the thyroid gland. Consistent with these observations, restoration of PPARγ expression in PPARγ-negative NPA cells derived from a papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) decreased cell growth, and PPARγ agonists induced further inhibition, both associated with increased p27(kip1) protein levels and apoptotic cell death [52]. A dose-dependent growth-inhibitory effect was also observed in the PPARγ-positive ATC cell lines OCUT-1 and ACT-1 after treatment with the PPARγ ligands troglitazone and 15-deoxy-delta 12,14-prostaglandin J2. Cells were arrested in G1 via a p53-independent, but p21- and p27-dependent cytostatic pathway [53].

1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (VitD3)
VitD3 also activates a nuclear receptor that belongs to the same family as RAR and PPARγ and also forms heterodimers with RXR. VitD3 plays a role in Ca2+ and phosphate metabolism, in the differentiation of bone and skin and has shown anti-tumor effects in several preclinical and clinical studies [54-56]. VitD3 as well as its synthetic analogs, 22-oxa-1,25(OH)2D3 (OCT) and EB1089 exhibited a dose-dependent, growth-inhibitory effect on human PTC-derived NPA cells in vitro [57,58]. VitD3 and EB1089 were also shown to induce a G1-phase arrest accompanied by an increase in the expression of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, p27(kip1) due to reduced degradation. Dackiw et al. [59] used a model of 4- to 5-week-old female SCID mice xenografted with WRO cells which are derived from a human follicular thyroid carcinoma (FTC). Mice were treated i.p. three times a week with 0.75 µg/kg VitD3 or vehicle and killed after 21 d. Tumors from vehicle-treated animals demonstrated morphological features of epithelial malignancies with characteristics of insular carcinoma and multiple metastases to the lungs, whereas tumors from VitD3-treated animals demonstrated signs of differentiation with restoration of Tg staining, associated with a marked accumulation of p27(kip1) immunoreactivity in the nuclear compartment.

2) Modulating gene expression via HDAC inhibitors:

As described above, a consequence of nuclear receptor-dependent transcriptional regulation is an alteration in chromatin modification by interaction with histone modifying enzymes. Instead of this indirect mechanism, histone modifying proteins may be targeted directly, e.g., by the use of HDAC inhibitors. This is a quite heterogeneous class of substances, including, e.g., hydroxamic acids (Trichostatin A (TSA), suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid), carboxylic acids (valproic (VPA) and butyric acid), benzamides (MS-275, N-acetyldinaline), and fungal metabolites (depsipeptide (FR901228, FK228), apicidin). The rationale for their use against cancer is the empirical observation that HDAC activity is generally increased in cancer cells, resulting in altered gene transcription. Furthermore, there is evidence that genes for HDACs are disrupted in certain malignancies or that there is an aberrant recruitment of HDACs by oncogenic transcription factors. In normal cells, the pattern of histone acetylation together with that of other histone modifications define the so-called “histone-code” which is involved in discriminating domains of active from those of inactive chromatin. The effects of the application of HDAC inhibitors on gene expression are, of course, more global, as the result is not the regulation of very specific responsive promoters, but a more general relief of gene silencing. Nevertheless, a significant up- or down-regulation is displayed by no more than 4 – 10 % of genes in cultured cells. Many of these genes are involved in growth arrest, apoptosis, angiogenesis and differentiation, e.g., the one coding for cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21WAF, which is up-regulated by all known HDAC inhibitors. A couple of publications describe anti-cancer properties of HDAC inhibitors in several cancer cell lines and animal models, and several phase I/II clinical studies indicate that they are well-tolerated drugs [60,61].

Valproic acid (VPA)
VPA has been used for years as an antiepileptic drug before its properties as a HDAC inhibitor were discovered [62], and both its pharmacological properties and the spectrum of its side effects are well characterized. Pharmacologic concentrations determined in patients taking VPA for anticonvulsant therapy reach 0.7 mM. Catalano et al. [63] demonstrated effects of VPA in the poorly differentiated PTC cell lines NPA and BHT-101. At concentrations ≥ 1 mM, they observed a decrease in cell viability, an increase of apoptosis via caspase 9, and an induction of cell cycle arrest at G1. The latter was accompanied by up-regulation of p21WAF and down-regulation of cyclin A mRNAs and proteins. Furthermore, NIS mRNA expression is increased in NPA cells at VPA concentrations ≥ 1 mM and in the ATC cell line ARO at concentrations ≥ 1.5 mM. This was accompanied by an induction of NIS protein, which was localized in the plasma membrane of NPA but intracellularly in ARO cells. Iodide uptake was only increased in NPA cells [64].

Depsipeptide (FR901228, FK228):
Furuya et al. [65] described the powerful effects of depsipeptide on BHP18–21v (derived from a PTC) and ARO cells. At concentrations from 1 to 10 ng/ml, NIS, TPO and Tg mRNA and protein expression were stimulated. Iodide uptake was increased from 3 ng/ml on in both cell lines. Furthermore, in the treated cells, accumulated iodide was organified into a protein species of more than 210 kDa molecular weight, probably by depsipeptide-induced TPO, as this effect could be blocked by the TPO inhibitor methimazol at a concentration of 300 µM. Depsipeptide also increased accumulation, retention and organification of iodide in tumors that had grown from xenotransplanted BHP18-21v cells on nude mice. In these tumors depsipeptide could also induce the expression of NIS, Tg and TPO mRNAs, whereas TSH-R mRNA was not stimulated. Depsipeptide also increased dose-dependently the expression of TTF-1, but not of PAX8, mRNA in BHP-18-21v and ARO cells.
Kitazono et al. [66] performed all their experiments using FTC-133, FTC-236, Kat-4 and SW-1736 cells at a depsipeptide concentration of 1 ng/ml, which is only minimally cytotoxic as determined by MTT assay. After 48 and/or 72 h, they observed increased histone acetylation by Western blot and immunocytochemistry, elevated iodide uptake after 72 h and enhanced activity of a Tg promoter/luciferase reporter construct in all cell lines. Depsipeptide also restored expression and function of p53 in SW-1736 cells which are “pseudo-null” for this protein [67].
It may be added that the concentrations required to see effects in thyroid carcinoma cell lines can easily be achieved in patients, as in phase I studies concentrations up to 500 ng/ml have been tolerated without significant toxicity [66].

Trichostatin A
A reduced cell viability at TSA concentrations up to 250 ng/ml was described for TPC-1, FTC-133 and XTC-1 cells, deriving from a PTC, an FTC and a Huerthle cell carcinoma (HTC), with cytotoxicity occurring from 1000 ng/ml on. NIS mRNA was induced by 50 and 100 ng/ml TSA and basal pendrin gene expression was reduced by these two concentrations [68]. In cell lines derived from primary ATC, sodium butyrate and TSA repressed proliferation independent of the p53 status through the induction of apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in G1 or G2/M. Apoptosis was associated with the appearance of the cleaved form of the caspase substrate, poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), while a reduced expression of cyclins A and B, an increased expression of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors, p21WAF1 and p27(kip1), a reduced phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma protein and a reduction in cdk2- and cdk1-associated kinase activities accompanied cell cycle arrest. However, in ATC cells overexpressing cyclin E, drug treatment failed to replicate these events [69].

3) Modulating gene expression by inhibition of DNA methyl transferases

DNA methylation is a covalent modification of CpG dinucleotides in genomic DNA which plays a role in the regulation of gene activity, namely transcriptional repression, and results, e.g., in long-term silencing of genes by X chromosome inactivation or genomic imprinting. Two mechanisms have been described: One is the direct inhibition of transcription factor binding to a methylated response element. The other is based on proteins such as MBD 1-3 and MECP2 that specifically bind to methylated CpG dinucleotides, interact with histone methylases or HDACs and thereby contribute to the generation of inaccessible chromatin [70]. Abnormal patterns of DNA methylation are observed in human cancers [71], among them those of the thyroid gland [72], and include general genomic hypomethylation in combination with regional hypermethylation. Hypermethylation-triggered silencing affects genes involved in almost all of the important steps of cancerogenesis: cell-cycle regulation, DNA repair, drug resistance and detoxification, apoptosis, differentiation, angiogenesis, and metastasis, e.g., the genes coding for CRABP1, CDKN2/p16INK4A, RASSF1, LKB1, MT1G, maspin, E-cadherin, TSH receptor, NIS, pendrin and 5’DI in thyroid cancer and/or carcinoma cell lines [73-85]. Recently, Hoque et al. [86] showed hypermethylation for Rassf1A, TSHR, RAR-beta2, DAPK, CDH1, TIMP3, and TGF-beta, and, furthermore, a trend toward multiple hypermethylation in thyroid cancer tissues. Hypermethylation of 2 or more markers was detectable in 25% of hyperplasias, 38% of adenomas, 48% of thyroid cancers, and 100% of cell lines, and a subset of these markers were epigenetically modified in concert, probably reflecting an organ-specific regulation process. E.g., a positive correlation was found between the BRAF mutation and RAR-beta2, and a negative correlation was found between BRAF and Rassf1A.
Interference with DNA methylation to release gene silencing and thereby activate dormant tumor suppressor genes for experimental and clinical purposes makes use of derivatives of cytidine derivatives, namely 5-aza-cytidine or 5-aza-2’-deoxycytidine (decitabine). They get incorporated into DNA during replication (or, as for 5-aza-cytidine, also into RNA) and then inhibit the action of DNA methyltransferases. Several clinical phase-I/II trials have been performed for solid tumors, however, the highest potential for these substances has so far been demonstrated in the case of hematological malignancies [87].
As for thyroid cancer, Venkataraman et al. [4] analyzed a collection of human thyroid carcinomas with different pathologies and reported variable methylation patterns of the hNIS promoter and first exon which, however, did not correlate with NIS mRNA expression or clinical iodide uptake. When seven human thyroid carcinoma cell lines lacking NIS mRNA were treated with 5-azacytidine or sodium butyrate, NIS mRNA expression was re-induced in four and iodide transport in two cell lines. This was associated with demethylation of NIS DNA in the untranslated region within the first exon and with restoration of the expression of TTF-1.
An association has been demonstrated between de-differentiation of thyroid carcinomas and E-cadherin expression in ATC, and E-cadherin expression is an independent prognostic factor for highly differentiated thyroid tumors. Hypermethylation of CpG islands in the proximal promoter region of the E-cadherin gene could be demonstrated in thyroid tumors and in E-cadherin-negative cell lines derived from thyroid carcinomas [88]. On the other hand, treatment with 5-aza-2’-deoxycytidine restored E-cadherin expression in 5 thyroid carcinoma cell lines [89].
Results from our group indicate that methylation of a GC-rich region close to a thyroid hormone responsive element in the 5’DI promoter may be responsible for silencing of the 5’DI gene in human thyroid FTC cell lines FTC-133, FTC-238 and HTh74. Treatment of these cell lines with 5-aza-2’-deoxycytidine drastically increases both 5’DI mRNA and enzyme activity [85]. Interestingly, this increase was also seen in the ATC cell line HTh74, where 5’DI was not stimulated by RA [23].

4) Miscellaneous

Phenylacetate
Phenylacetate and phenylbutyrate are reported to inhibit growth and to modulate differentiation in a variety of cancer cell lines as well as in patients at concentrations exhibiting minimal toxicity. Inhibition of HDACs and activation of PPARγ are discussed as possible mechanisms [90,91]. In five FTC cell lines, cell cycle arrest in the G0-1 phase occurred at a dose of 2.5-10 mmol/L phenylacetate. Increased radioiodide uptake (in 2 out of 5 cell lines) and decreased secretion of vascular endothelial growth factor were also observed [92]. Furthermore, combination of phenylacetate and RA had synergistic effects: In FTC-133 cells, RA (2.5 µmol/L) inhibited growth by 16% and PA (10 mmol/L) by 35% versus controls, whereas the combination inhibited growth by 60% at 5 days [93].

Resveratrol
Resveratrol, trans-3,5,4'-trihydroxystilbene, is a fruit constituent of various plants, including grapes, berries and peanuts. Besides cardioprotective effects, resveratrol exhibits anticancer properties in a wide variety of tumor cells. The growth-inhibitory effects of resveratrol are mediated through cell-cycle arrest and activation of caspases; suppression of angiogenesis has also been described. In vivo, resveratrol shows both chemopreventive and therapeutic effects against cancer and seems to be pharmacologically quite safe [94]. In two PTC and two FTC cell lines, treatment with 1-10 µM resveratrol induced apoptosis by increasing p53 expression and serine phosphorylation via a Ras-MAPK kinase-MAPK signal transduction pathway [95].

3-Hydroxymethyl-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) inhibitors: Statins
Statins have been approved for the treatment of lipid disorders. However, studies in cell culture, with experimental animals and first trials in patients also indicated antitumor properties such as induction of growth arrest and apoptosis as well as inhibition of metastasis and of angiogenesis [96]. In thyroid carcinoma cell lines, lovastatin induced apoptosis, and several different mechanisms have been discussed, such as inhibition of geranylgeranylation of Rho proteins, lamin B proteolysis and cytochrome C release from mitochondria [97].

Concluding remarks

From the data reviewed above it is clear that there is a broad selection of drugs inducing (partial) re-differentiation and exerting anti-tumor effects on experimental models for thyroid cancer, which now have to be tested in patients. To date, there are five clinical trials evaluating re-differentiation therapy for thyroid cancer listed by the NIH [98]: a phase I and a phase II study on depsipeptide, a phase II study on 5-aza-2’-deoxycytidine, and a phase I study on rosiglitazone; a phase I on azacytidine is no longer recruiting patients (Table 2).


Table 2 as PDF

A multi-center phase II/III trial on RA has just been started (“MSSR study”)[44). Data published on RA show that a certain number of patients seems to experience benefit from this kind of therapy, however, most patients did not respond. Whereas studies initially reported response rates of about 20 % [35,39], they may be lower after longer follow-up intervals [42]. For an extensive discussion, see references [34-42]. Other re-differentiating agents might be more efficient, especially as PPARγ ligands, HDAC inhibitors or DNA methylation inhibitors show positive effects in ATC cell lines where RA was inactive [52,64,85]. The most promising feature of these drugs, however, might be their use in combination. As they target several different aspects of the same process, i.e., control of gene activity, their combination may be synergistic. Thus, HDAC inhibitors could open up chromatin and give nuclear RA or VitD3 receptors access to gene regulatory sequences. Similar considerations hold true for a combination of HDAC and DNA methylase inhibitors due to the interaction of methylated CpG-binding proteins with HDACs. Combination of drugs may also help to reduce doses of single compounds to circumvent possible dangerous side effects that are elicited by methyl transferase inhibitors [99]. Conforming with these considerations, the HDAC inhibitor m-carboxycinnamic acid bis-hydroxamide (CBHA) at 50, 100, and 200 mg/kg/day inhibited growth of SMS-KCN-69 neuroblastoma tumor xenografts on immunodeficient mice in a dose-dependent fashion, with 200 mg/kg CBHA resulting in a complete suppression of tumor growth. The efficacy of 50 and 100 mg/kg CBHA was enhanced by the addition of 2.5 mg/kg all-trans RA, while this dose of all-trans RA was ineffective when administered alone [100]. In a mouse model for lung cancer, treatment with low doses of 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (0.5 mg/kg) decreased the incidence of neoplasms by 30%. When the methyl transferase inhibitor 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine was combined with the HDAC inhibitor phenylbutyrate (300 mg/kg), lung tumor development was significantly reduced by >50%, while no effect was seen with phenylbutyrate alone [101].
Thyroid cancer in general is an easily treatable disease with a good prognosis. However, in a considerable number of cases, de-differentiation of the tumors makes classical therapy obsolete and, therefore, other approaches are required. Starting from the first attempts using RA, the field of re-differentiation therapy for thyroid cancer has developed and now offers promising new prospects in vitro and in experimental animals. Hopefully, it will be possible, after they have shown their potential in the ongoing clinical trials, to transform them into new therapeutic alternatives for otherwise untreatable thyroid cancer patients.

 
REFERENCES
 
1. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell 100:57-70,2000
2. Mueller MM, Fusenig NE. Friends or foes - bipolar effects of the tumour stroma in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 4:839-849,2004
3. Feinberg AP. The epigenetics of cancer etiology. Semin Cancer Biol 14:427-432, 2004
4. Venkataraman GM, Yatin M, Marcinek R, et al. Restoration of iodide uptake in dedifferentiated thyroid carcinoma: relationship to human Na+/I-symporter gene methylation status. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:2449-2457,1999
5. Puglisi F, Cesselli D, Damante G, et al. Expression of Pax-8, p53 and bcl-2 in human benign and malignant thyroid diseases. Anticancer Res 20:311-316,2000
6. Katoh R, Kawaoi A, Miyagi E, et al. Thyroid transcription factor-1 in normal, hyperplastic, and neoplastic follicular thyroid cells examined by immunohistochemistry and nonradioactive in situ hybridization. Mod Pathol 13:570-576,2000
7. Lazar V, Bidart JM, Caillou B, et al. Expression of the Na+/I- symporter gene in human thyroid tumors: a comparison study with other thyroid-specific genes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:3228-3234,1999
8. Wiseman SM, Loree TR, Rigual NR, et al. Anaplastic transformation of thyroid cancer: review of clinical, pathologic, and molecular evidence provides new insights into disease biology and future therapy. Head Neck 25:662-670,2003
9. Schmutzler C, Köhrle J. Retinoic acid re-differentiation therapy for thyroid cancer. Thyroid 10:393-406,2000
10. Sun SY and Lotan R. Retinoids and their receptors in cancer development and chemoprevention. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 41:41-55,2002
11. Niles RM. Signaling pathways in retinoid chemoprevention and treatment of cancer. Mutat Res 555:81-96,2004
12. Bastien J, Rochette-Egly C. Nuclear retinoid receptors and the transcription of retinoid-target genes. Gene 328:1-16,2004
13. del Senno L, Rossi R, Franceschetti P, et al. Expression of all-trans-retinoic acid receptor RNA in human thyroid cells. Biochem Mol Biol Int 33:1107-1115,1994
14. Schmutzler C, Brtko J, Winzer R, et al. Functional retinoid and thyroid hormone receptors in human thyroid-carcinoma cell lines and tissues. Int J Cancer 76:368-376,1998
15. Rochaix P, Monteil-Onteniente S, Rochette-Egly C, et al. Reduced expression of retinoic acid receptor beta protein (RAR beta) in human papillary thyroid carcinoma: immunohistochemical and western blot study. Histopathology 33:337-343,1998
16. Tang W, Nakamura Y, Zuo H, et al. Differentiation, proliferation and retinoid receptor status of papillary carcinoma of the thyroid. Pathol Int 53:204-213,2003
17. Takiyama Y, Miyokawa N, Sugawara A, et al. Decreased expression of retinoid X receptor isoforms in human thyroid carcinomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:5851-5861,2004
18. Haugen BR, Larson LL, Pugazhenthi U, et al. Retinoic acid and retinoid X receptors are differentially expressed in thyroid cancer and thyroid carcinoma cell lines and predict response to treatment with retinoids. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:272-280,2004
19. Schmutzler C, Hoang-Vu C, Ruger B, et al. Human thyroid carcinoma cell lines show different retinoic acid receptor repertoires and retinoid responses. Eur J Endocrinol 150:547-556,2004
20. Elisei R, Vivaldi A, Agate L, et al. All-trans retinoic acid treatment inhibits the growth of RAR? mRNA expressing thyroid cancer cell lines but does not re-induce the expression of thyroid specific genes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90:2403-2411,2005
21. Kurebayashi J, Tanaka K, Otsuki T, et al. All-trans-retinoic acid modulates expression levels of thyroglobulin and cytokines in a new human poorly differentiated papillary thyroid carcinoma cell line, KTC-1. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:2889-2896,2000
22. Bassi V, Vitale M, Feliciello A, et al. Retinoic acid induces intercellular adhesion molecule-1 hyperexpression in human thyroid carcinoma cell lines. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 80:1129-1135,1995
23. Schreck R, Schnieders F, Schmutzler C, et al. Retinoids stimulate type I iodothyronine 5'-deiodinase activity in human follicular thyroid carcinoma cell lines. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 79:791-798,1994
24. Menth M, Schmutzler C, Mentrup B, et al. Selenoprotein expression in Hürthle cell carcinomas and in the human Hürthle cell carcinoma line XTC.UC1 Thyroid 15:405-416,2005
25. Hoang-Vu C, Bull K, Schwarz I, et al. Regulation of CD97 protein in thyroid carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:1104-1109,1999
26. Havekes B, Schroder van der Elst JP, van der Pluijm G, et al. Beneficial effects of retinoic acid on extracellular matrix degradation and attachment behaviour in follicular thyroid carcinoma cell lines. J Endocrinol 167:229-238,2000
27. Van Herle AJ, Agatep ML, Padua DN 3rd, et al. Effects of 13 cis-retinoic acid on growth and differentiation of human follicular carcinoma cells (UCLA R0 82 W-1) in vitro. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 71:755-763,1990
28. Schmutzler C, Winzer R, Meissner-Weigl J, et al. Retinoic acid increases sodium/iodide symporter mRNA levels in human thyroid cancer cell lines and suppresses expression of functional symporter in nontransformed FRTL-5 rat thyroid cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 240:832-838,1997
29. Schmutzler C, Schmitt TL, Glaser F, et al. The promoter of the human sodium/iodide-symporter gene responds to retinoic acid. Mol Cell Endocrinol 189:145-155,200
30. Schmutzler C. Regulation of the sodium/iodide symporter by retinoids--a review. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 109:41-44,2001
31. Spitzweg C, Scholz IV, Bergert ER, et al. Retinoic acid-induced stimulation of sodium iodide symporter expression and cytotoxicity of radioiodine in prostate cancer cells. Endocrinology 144:3423-3432,2003
32. Koerber C, Schmutzler C, Rendl J, et al. Increased I-131 uptake in local recurrence and distant metastases after second treatment with retinoic acid. Clin Nucl Med 24:849-851,1999
33. Jakobs TC, Schmutzler C, Meissner J, et al. The promoter of the human type I 5'-deiodinase gene--mapping of the transcription start site and identification of a DR+4 thyroid-hormone-responsive element. Eur J Biochem 247:288-297,1997
34. Toyoda N, Zavacki AM, Maia AL, et al. A novel retinoid X receptor-independent thyroid hormone response element is present in the human type 1 deiodinase gene. Mol Cell Biol 15:5100-5112,1995
35. Simon D, Korber C, Krausch M, et al. Clinical impact of retinoids in re-differentiation therapy of advanced thyroid cancer: final results of a pilot study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 29:775-782,2002
36. Simon D, Koehrle J, Reiners C, et al. Re-differentiation therapy with retinoids: therapeutic option for advanced follicular and papillary thyroid carcinoma. World J Surg 22:569-574,1998
37. Simon D, Köhrle J, Schmutzler C, et al. Re-differentiation therapy of differentiated thyroid carcinoma with retinoic acid: basics and first clinical results. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 104 Suppl 4:13-15,1996
38. Grunwald F, Pakos E, Bender H, et al. Re-differentiation therapy with retinoic acid in follicular thyroid cancer. J Nucl Med 39:1555-1558,1998
39. Grunwald F, Menzel C, Bender H, et al. Re-differentiation therapy-induced radioiodine uptake in thyroid cancer. J Nucl Med 39:1903-1906,1998
40. Toubert ME, Darsin D, Cassinat B, et al. Retinoids in radioiodine negative differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) patients. European Thyroid Association Annual Meeting, Edinburgh, October 18 -22, 2003 (abstract).
41. Coelho SM, Corbo R, Buescu A, et al. Retinoic acid in patients with radioiodine non-responsive thyroid carcinoma. J Endocrinol Invest 27:334-339,2004
42. Grüning T, Tiepolt C, Zophel K, et al. Retinoic acid for re-differentiation of thyroid cancer--does it hold its promise? Eur J Endocrinol 148:395-402,2003
43. Short SC, Suovuori A, Cook G, et al. A phase II study using retinoids as redifferentiation agents to increase iodine uptake in metastatic thyroid cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 16:569-574,2004
44. 44. Multicentric Study for the Stimulation of Redifferentiation of Human Thyroid Cancer by Retinoic Acid (MSSR): the protocol can be obtained from the study secretary Dr. Markus Luster, Clinic of Nuclear Medicine, University of Wuerzburg (luster@nuklearmedizin.uni-wuerzburg.de).
45. Knouff C, Auwerx J. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma calls for activation in moderation: lessons from genetics and pharmacology. Endocr Rev 5:899-918,2004
46. Kroll TG, Sarraf P, Pecciarini L, et al. PAX8-PPARgamma1 fusion oncogene in human thyroid carcinoma. Science 289:1357-1360,2000
47. Marques AR, Espadinha C, Frias MJ, et al. Underexpression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)gamma in PAX8/PPARgamma-negative thyroid tumours. Br J Cancer 91:732-738,2004
48. Cheung L, Messina M, Gill A, et al. Detection of the PAX8-PPAR gamma fusion oncogene in both follicular thyroid carcinomas and adenomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:354-357,2003
49. Nikiforova MN, Lynch RA, Biddinger PW, et al. RAS point mutations and PAX8-PPAR gamma rearrangement in thyroid tumors: evidence for distinct molecular pathways in thyroid follicular carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:2318-2326,2003
50. Dwight T, Thoppe SR, Foukakis T, et al. Involvement of the PAX8/peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma rearrangement in follicular thyroid tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:4440-4445,2003
51. McIver B, Grebe SK, Eberhardt NL. The PAX8/PPAR gamma fusion oncogene as a potential therapeutic target in follicular thyroid carcinoma. Curr Drug Targets Immune Endocr Metabol Disord 4:221-234,2004
52. Martelli ML, Iuliano R, Le Pera I, et al. Inhibitory effects of peroxisome poliferator-activated receptor gamma on thyroid carcinoma cell growth. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:4728-4735,2002
53. Chung SH, Onoda N, Ishikawa T, et al. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma activation induces cell cycle arrest via the p53-independent pathway in human anaplastic thyroid cancer cells. Jpn J Cancer Res 93:1358-1365,2002
54. Bikle DD. Vitamin D regulated keratinocyte differentiation. J Cell Biochem 92:436-444,2004
55. van Driel M, Pols HA, van Leeuwen JP. Osteoblast differentiation and control by vitamin D and vitamin D metabolites. Curr Pharm Des 10:2535-2555,2004
56. Trump DL, Hershberger PA, Bernardi RJ, et al. Anti-tumor activity of calcitriol: pre-clinical and clinical studies. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 89-90:519-526,2004
57. Okano K, Usa T, Ohtsuru A, et al. Effect of 22-oxa-1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 on human thyroid cancer cell growth. Endocr J 46:243-252,1999
58. Liu W, Asa SL, Fantus IG, et al. Vitamin D arrests thyroid carcinoma cell growth and induces p27 dephosphorylation and accumulation through PTEN/akt-dependent and –independent pathways. Am J Pathol 160:511-519,2002
59. Dackiw AP, Ezzat S, Huang P, et al. Vitamin D3 administration induces nuclear p27 accumulation, restores differentiation, and reduces tumor burden in a mouse model of metastatic follicular thyroid cancer. Endocrinology 145:5840-5846,2004
60. Villar-Garea A, Esteller M. Histone deacetylase inhibitors: understanding a new wave of anticancer agents. Int J Cancer 112:171-178,2004
61. Drummond DC, Noble CO, Kirpotin DB, et al. Clinical Development of Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors As Anticancer Agents. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 45:495-528,2005
62. Göttlicher M, Minucci S, Zhu P, et al. Valproic acid defines a novel class of HDAC inhibitors inducing differentiation of transformed cells. EMBO J 20:6969-6978,2001
63. Catalano MG, Fortunati N, Pugliese M, et al. Valproic acid induces apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in poorly differentiated thyroid cancer cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90:1383-1389,2005
64. Fortunati N, Catalano MG, Arena K, et al. Valproic acid induces the expression of the Na+/I- symporter and iodine uptake in poorly differentiated thyroid cancer cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:1006-1009,2004
65. Furuya F, Shimura H, Suzuki H, et al. Histone deacetylase inhibitors restore radioiodide uptake and retention in poorly differentiated and anaplastic thyroid cancer cells by expression of the sodium/iodide symporter thyroperoxidase and thyroglobulin. Endocrinology 145:2865-2875,2004
66. Kitazono M, Robey R, Zhan Z, et al. Low concentrations of the histone deacetylase inhibitor, depsipeptide (FR901228), increase expression of the Na(+)/I(-) symporter and iodine accumulation in poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:3430-3435,2001
67. Kitazono M, Bates S, Fok P, et al. The histone deacetylase inhibitor FR901228 (desipeptide) restores expression and function of pseudo-null p53. Cancer Biol Ther 1:665-668,2002
68. Zarnegar R, Brunaud L, Kanauchi H, et al. Increasing the effectiveness of radioactive iodine therapy in the treatment of thyroid cancer using Trichostatin A, a histone deacetylase inhibitor. Surgery 132:984-990,2002
69. Greenberg VL, Williams JM, Cogswell JP, et al. Histone deacetylase inhibitors promote apoptosis and differential cell cycle arrest in anaplastic thyroid cancer cells. Thyroid 11:315-325,2001
70. Scarano MI, Strazzullo M, Matarazzo MR, et al. DNA methylation 40 years later: Its role in human health and disease. J Cell Physiol 204:21-35,2005
71. Das PM, Singal R. DNA methylation and cancer. J Clin Oncol 22:4632-42,2004
72. Matsuo K, Tang SH, Zeki K, et al. Aberrant deoxyribonucleic acid methylation in human thyroid tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 77:991-995,1993
73. de Capoa A, Grappelli C, Volpino P, et al. Nuclear methylation levels in normal and cancerous thyroid cells. Anticancer Res 24:1495-1500,2004
74. Huang Y, de la Chapelle A, Pellegata NS. Hypermethylation, but not LOH, is associated with the low expression of MT1G and CRABP1 in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Int J Cancer 104:735-744,2003
75. Elisei R, Shiohara M, Koeffler HP, et al. Genetic and epigenetic alterations of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors p15INK4b and p16INK4a in human thyroid carcinoma cell lines and primary thyroid carcinomas. Cancer 83:2185-2193,1998
76. Boltze C, Zack S, Quednow C, et al. Hypermethylation of the CDKN2/p16INK4A promotor in thyroid carcinogenesis. Pathol Res Pract 199:399-404,2003
77. Schagdarsurengin U, Gimm O, Hoang-Vu C, et al. Frequent epigenetic silencing of the CpG island promoter of RASSF1A in thyroid carcinoma. Cancer Res 62:3698-3701,2002
78. Wong IH, Chan J, Wong J, et al. Ubiquitous aberrant RASSF1A promoter methylation in childhood neoplasia. Clin Cancer Res 10:994-1002,2004
79. Esteller M, Avizienyte E, Corn PG, et al. Epigenetic inactivation of LKB1 in primary tumors associated with the Peutz-Jeghers syndrome. Oncogene 19:164-168,2000
80. Ogasawara S, Maesawa C, Yamamoto M, et al. Disruption of cell-type-specific methylation at the Maspin gene promoter is frequently involved in undifferentiated thyroid cancers. Oncogene 23:1117-1124,2004
81. Graff JR, Greenberg VE, Herman JG, et al. Distinct patterns of E-cadherin CpG island methylation in papillary, follicular, Hurthle's cell, and poorly differentiated human thyroid carcinoma. Cancer Res 58:2063-2066,1998
82. Rocha AS, Soares P, Seruca R, et al. Abnormalities of the E-cadherin/catenin adhesion complex in classical papillary thyroid carcinoma and in its diffuse sclerosing variant. J Pathol 194:358-366,2001
83. Xing M, Usadel H, Cohen Y, et al. Methylation of the thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor gene in epithelial thyroid tumors: a marker of malignancy and a cause of gene silencing. Cancer Res 63:2316-2321,2003
84. Xing M, Tokumaru Y, Wu G, et al. Hypermethylation of the Pendred syndrome gene SLC26A4 is an early event in thyroid tumorigenesis. Cancer Res 63:2312-2315,2003
85. Mentrup B, Herbert S, Schmutzler C, et al. The expression of the human type I 5’ Iodothyronine deiodinase depends on the methylation status of the cell. J Endocrinol Invest 25(Suppl. to no. 7):29,2002 (abstract)
86. Hoque MO, Rosenbaum E, Westra WH, et al. Quantitative Assessment of Promoter Methylation Profiles in Thyroid Neoplasms. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2005 Apr 19; [Epub ahead of print]
87. Esteller M. DNA methylation and cancer therapy: new developments and expectations. Curr Opin Oncol 17:55-60,2005
88. Potter E, Bergwitz C, Brabant G. The cadherin-catenin system: implications for growth and differentiation ofendocrine tissues. Endocr Rev 20:207-239,1999
89. Potter E, Oster H, Mayr B, et al. DNA hypermethylation is involved in altered expression of cell adhesion molecules of the E-cadherin/catenin system in human thyroid carcinoma cells. J Endocrinol Invest 20(Suppl. 5):79,1997 (abstract)
90. Mo H, Elson CE. Studies of the isoprenoid-mediated inhibition of mevalonate synthesis applied to cancer chemotherapy and chemoprevention. Exp Biol Med (Maywood 229:567-585,2004
91. Samid D, Hudgins WR, Shack S, et al. Phenylacetate and phenylbutyrate as novel, nontoxic differentiation inducers. Adv Exp Med Biol 400A:501-505,1997
92. Kebebew E, Wong MG, Siperstein AE, et al. Phenylacetate inhibits growth and vascular endothelial growth factor secretion in human thyroid carcinoma cells and modulates their differentiated function. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:2840-2847,1999
93. Eigelberger MS, Wong MG, Duh QY, et al. Phenylacetate enhances the antiproliferative effect of retinoic acid in follicular thyroid cancer.
Surgery 130:931-935,2001
94. Aggarwal BB, Bhardwaj A, Aggarwal RS, et al. Role of resveratrol in prevention and therapy of cancer: preclinical and clinical studies. Anticancer Res 24(5A):2783-840,2004
95. Shih A, Davis FB, Lin HY, et al. Resveratrol induces apoptosis in thyroid cancer cell lines via a MAPK- and p53-dependent mechanism.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:1223-1232,2002
96. Graaf MR, Richel DJ, van Noorden CJ, et al. Effects of statins and farnesyltransferase inhibitors on the development and progression of cancer. Cancer Treat Rev 30:609-641,2004
97. Park JW, Clark OH. Re-differentiation therapy for thyroid cancer. Surg Clin North Am 84:921-943,2004
98. www.clinicaltrials.gov; www.cancer.gov
99. Thomas GA, Williams ED. Production of thyroid tumours in mice by demethylating agents. Carcinogenesis 13:1039-1042,1992
100. Coffey DC, Kutko MC, Glick RD, et al. The histone deacetylase inhibitor, CBHA, inhibits growth of human neuroblastoma xenografts in vivo, alone and synergistically with all-trans retinoic acid. Cancer Res 61:3591-3594,2001
101. Belinsky SA, Klinge DM, Stidley CA, et al. Inhibition of DNA methylation and histone deacetylation prevents murine lung cancer. Cancer Res 63:7089-7093,2003
 
 
     
     
  Address:
Redifferentiation therapy of thyroid cancer