|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
| |
CHERNOBYL BEYOND 20 YEARS AND THYROID CANCER
|
|
| |
Shunichi Yamashita, M.D.
Department of Public Health and Environment, WHO, Geneva, Atomic Bomb Disease Institute, Nagasaki University, Current address, Appia Avenue, CH-1211 Geneva 27 ,
,
Switzerland
,
email:
yamashitas@who.int
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
printed version |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Editorial 2006
Abstract
April 26, 2006 was the 20th anniversary of the Chernobyl Nuclear
Plant Accident. At that time there was no reliable information concerning
the massive amount of radioactive materials that escaped from the
reactor. We know however that Belarus, Russia and Ukraine, were
exposed to huge amounts of radioactive materials. In exposed children
and adolescents a dramatic increase in the incidence of thyroid
cancer has been observed while the adult population does not seem
to be affected by the radioiodine contamination. Yet 20 years of
observation may not be sufficient to evaluate the full radiological
consequences of this accident. Therefore, the current characteristics
of so-called “Chernobyl thyroid cancer” need to be reviewed
including long-term risk for thyroid cancer after radiation exposure
at the level of clinical and molecular epidemiology.
Introduction
Thyroid cancer is the most common type of human solid tumors associated
with external ionizing radiation exposure, especially if irradiation
occurs in neonates, infants and children (1). The health impacts
of the Chernobyl accident have recently been reviewed by the World
Health Organization (WHO) (2). Since the Chernobyl accident, specific
attention has been paid to an internal exposure of the thyroid gland
and its close relationship with childhood thyroid cancer (3). The
appropriate prophylaxis of iodine administration just after the
accident like in Poland (4) could contribute to mitigate the increase
of childhood thyroid cancer and also decrease the future risk of
thyroid cancer occurrence. Iodine deficiency is another risk factor
of radiation-induced thyroid cancer around Chernobyl (5).
Childhood thyroid cancers are originally quite uncommon and have
a fairly good prognosis despite of the aggressive manifestations.
Incidence of thyroid cancer in children dramatically increased around
Chernobyl from 1990 until 2000, probably attributed to short-lived
radioactive iodines. About 5000 childhood and adolescent cases of
thyroid cancers have been diagnosed from 1990 until 2005 around
Chernobyl with fewer than 20 deaths reported (6).
The knowledge gained in the last 20 years provides valuable information
for the advancement of thyroid cancer research. Here, clinical and
epidemiological data will be summarized and genetic and molecular
aspects of Chernobyl thyroid cancer briefly discussed.
Clinical characteristics of Chernobyl thyroid cancer
Papillary carcinoma is the most common malignant tumor of the thyroid
in both adults, adolescents and children. There have been already
several reports of an association between radioactive iodine exposure
and childhood thyroid cancer prevalence but the interpretation of
data still needs some straightforward refining (7-11). Adult thyroid
cancers include disease types that range from an indolent small-size
solitary malignant nodule to the fulminant and lethal anaplastic
carcinoma. Definitely, differences do exist between adult and childhood
papillary thyroid cancers. For example, childhood thyroid cancers
display a higher incidence of regional lymph node metastasis, extension
outside the thyroid capsule and lung metastasis. The initial comparative
study of post-Chernobyl thyroid cancer in Belarus and naturally
occurring thyroid cancer in Europe clearly demonstrated that individuals
5 year-old or less at the time of accident accounted for the majority
of thyroid cancer patients substantiating a necessity of careful
monitoring of the subjects of younger age at radiation exposure
(12). The prognosis of operated childhood thyroid cancer in Belarus
is quite favorable so far (13). There is no clear evidence at a
moment that the incidence of thyroid cancer has increased among
those exposed who were adult in 1986 (14,15), however the role of
adult radiation exposure, either by radioactive iodines or externally,
remains to be clarified.
In 1991, the Chernobyl Sasakawa Medical Aid Project was launched.
Until 2001, nearly 200,000 schoolchildren were screened. The results
point to the necessity of a cooperative multidisciplinary thyroid
cancer research system of the long-term health care of exposed individuals
(16,17). Along with a summary of clinical data on Chernobyl thyroid
cancer, the project will include the current understanding of the
molecular mechanisms of radiation-induced thyroid cancer in children
and adolescents. It will focus of how to further assist the long-term
follow-up of the operated patients and will outline the approaches
for the identification of high risk groups for the disease.
Age distribution of thyroid cancer morbidity after the
Chernobyl accident
A dramatic increase of childhood thyroid cancer was observed in
the early 1990s in Belarus (Fig1). The peak incidence of childhood
thyroid cancer after the Chernobyl accident is now over, shifting
from adolescents to young adult aged more than 20 year-old. Time
trends of thyroid cancer incidence are similar among the three affected
countries, supporting the concept that subjects of younger age at
the time of radiation exposure had, and continue to have, an elevated
risk of developing thyroid cancers. Despite of shortage of accurate
dosimetry data for individual children, comparative studies in Gomel
region, Belarus showed a significant effect of exposure to short-lived
radioactive fallout after Chernobyl since, at the time of accident,
the frequency of thyroid cancer in zero up to 3 year old children
increased dramatically (9). Today, new cases are mainly found in
20 to 30 year old patients.
The difference between early- and late-onset thyroid papillary thyroid
cancers after the Chernobyl accident, is under investigation but
so far no clinical differences besides of age-related particularities
of genetic background have been registered between childhood and
adult papillary thyroid cancers.

| Figure 1: Annual incidence of thyroid cancer
at the different age group in Belarus from 1986 until 2002.
At the time of surgical operation, three aged groups are categorized
from 0 to 14 (Children), from 15 to 18 (Adolescence) and from
19 to 35 year-old (Young adults). Courtesy of Dr. Yuri Demidchik. |
How can we distinguish between radiation-induced and sporadic
thyroid cancers?
High doses of ionizing radiation produce bulk damages in biological
objects inducing cell death. In contrast, low doses induce mainly
numerous DNA double strand breaks, deletions, point mutations and/or
chromosomal instability. It is therefore reasonable to postulate
that radiation induced papillary thyroid cancer could have specific
molecular markers. Three major approaches for molecular discrimination
between radiation-induced and sporadic thyroid cancers can be used:
1) mutational studies in radiation-induced and sporadic thyroid
tumors, 2) comparative gene expression studies, and 3) genomic studies
including molecular epidemiology in patients who developed radiation-associated
thyroid cancers.
Gene analysis resulted in the discovery of fusions between RET located
on chromosome 10q11.2 and other genes are specifically found in
papillary thyroid cancer tissues. These are collectively called
RET/PTC rearrangements and represent chimeric genes. Among 16 different
types of RET/PTCs, RET/PTC1 and RET/PTC3 are the most common variants
accounting for about 90% of all chimeric genes (18). The prevalence
of RET/PTC rearrangements ranges from 11% to 43% in sporadic papillary
thyroid cancers and 50-80% in patients with a history of radiation
exposure. In children affected by the Chernobyl accident, RET/PTC3
was the most common type in tumors developed less than 10 years
after the accident, whereas papillary thyroid cancers which occured
after a longer latency, had predominantly RET/PTC1 (19). However,
the high prevailance all the RET/PTC rearrangements is characteristic
of papillary cancer in young patients and not specific for irradiation.
Another type of gene rearrangement, AKAP9-BRAF fusion, has been
found in 11% of early onset papillary thyroid cancers but in 0%
of tumors with the longer latency after the accident (20). Point
mutation analysis of RAS-RAF-MAPK cascade genes, such as BRAF and
RAS were also performed . They showed no significant difference
of the mutational frequency between radiation-induced and sporadic
thyroid cancers when similar age groups of patients were compared
(21,22). The BRAF point mutation around Chernobyl is rare in childhood
thyroid cancer and similar to other areas in comparison with adult
papillary thyroid cancer (23).
As a whole, analysis of the mutational spectrum of the Chernobyl
thyroid malignancies demonstrates that gene rearrangements leading
to the activation of MAPK signaling pathway appear to play a perceptible
role in radiation-induced papillary thyroid cancer. Yet, none of
the cancer genes or impaired tumor suppressor genes has proved a
marker of radiation etiology and gene expression patterns in radiation-related
papillary thyroid cancers are similar to those in sporadic ones
(24). Therefore at a moment there is no established “radiation
signature” or any specific target gene has been identified.
Necessity of molecular epidemiology investigations
In view of the absence of genetic markers to distinguish between
radiation-induced and sporadic papillary thyroid cancers, further
genomic studies may give us critical hints of radiation sensitivity
and tumor-prone susceptibility in man. Since our understanding is
very limited as for why thyroid tumorigenesis occurs in a relatively
small number of exposed individuals, large scale molecular epidemiology
investigations in thoroughly designed cohorts around Chernobyl can
potentially identify at the biochemical or molecular level specific
exogenous and/or host factors which play a role in human cancer
causation. Pilot studies suggest that molecular epidemiological
methods targeting single nucleotide polymorphisms of DNA damage
response and cell cycle control genes may be a promising tool in
the area of radiation-induced carcinogenesis (25).
Chernobyl Tissue Bank
The considerable progress in our knowledge concerning radiation-induced
leukemia mechanisms in children (26) may lead us to similar progress
in radiation-induced thyroid cancer. One can surmise that the risk
of radiation-induce thyroid cancer in a population may be largely
attributable to a small number of predisposed individuals in whom
clonally expanded translocation-carrying pre-cancer cells have accumulated.
The high frequency of RET/PTC rearrangement has been predominantly
seen in the early onset cancers in young age group of children after
the Chernobyl accident; it seems to be declining gradually with
patients’ aging. The immature or precursor stem-cell like
thyrocyte may be considered a preexisting initiated cell that might
harbor a RET/PTC rearrangement. Indeed, RET/PTC rearrangement alone
is unlikely to be sufficient to transform human thyrocyte. Thus,
it is essential to elucidate genetic particularities of patients
with radiation-induced thyroid cancers.
A research bank of biological samples and data has been established
as an international cooperative project, the so called “Chernobyl
Tissue Bank” (27) which is open to the scientific community.
This is likely to favor markedly progess in this area of research.
Summary and conclusion
Today, 20 years after the Chernobyl accident, the large increase
in thyroid cancer incidence among those exposed in childhood and
adolescence continues. In contrast, no clearly demonstrated increase
in the incidence of other cancers can be attributed to radiation
exposure from the accident (28). Although radiation-induced thyroid
cancer is a well-recognized medical phenomenon based on wide-ranged
epidemiological studies, molecular signature(s) and other details
of papillary thyroid cancer remain to be further clarified to pinpoint
differential diagnostic criteria not only in childhood and adult
thyroid cancers but also in radiation-induced and sporadic cancers
(29). The latest study in Hiroshima and Nagasaki Atomic Bomb survivors
in Japan has indicated that a biological effect from a single brief
external exposure to ionizing radiation nearly 60 years in the past
still occurs and can be detected (30). In childhood, once exposed
even to low doses of ionizing radiation, either externally or internally,
the cancer-prone cell damage within the thyroid gland can be preserved
for a long time. Today, special attention should be paid to a high
risk group of individuals who have been exposed to radioactive iodines
just after the Chernobyl accident and who are now 20 to 30 year-old.
Elucidation of the molecular mechanisms of radiation-induced thyroid
cancer is expected to contribute to the disease prevention and treatment
in the coming future.
|
|
| |
REFERENCES |
| |
| 1. |
Ron E, Lubin JH, Shore RE et al. Thyroid
cancer after exposure to external radiation; a pooled analysis of
seven studies. Radiat Res 141: 256-277, 1995 |
| 2. |
http://www.who.int/ionizing_radiation/chernobyl/en/index.html |
| 3. |
Kazakov VS, Demidchik EP, Astakhova LN.
Thyroid cancer after Chernobyl. Nature 359: 21, 1992 |
| 4. |
Nauman J, Wolff J. Iodine prophylaxis in
Poland after the Chernobyl reactor accident; benefits and risks. Am
J Med 94: 524-532, 1993 |
| 5. |
Ashizawa K, Shibata Y, Yamashita S et al.
Prevalence of goiter and urinary iodine excretion levels in children
around Chernobyl. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82: 3430-3433, 1997 |
| 6. |
Hatch M, Ron E, Bouville A, Zablotska,
Howe G. The Chernobyl disaster: cancer following the accident at the
Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant. Epidemiol Rev 27: 56-66, 2005 |
| 7. |
Likhtarev IA, Sobolev BG, Kairo IA, Tronko
ND, Bogdanova TI, Oleinic VA, Epshtein EV, Beral V. Thyroid cancer
in the Ukraine. Nature 375: 365, 1995 |
| 8. |
Jacob P, Kenigsberg Y, Zvonova I et al.
Childhood exposure due to the Chernobyl accident and thyroid cancer
risk in contaminated areas of Belarus and Russia. Br J Cancer 80:
1461-1469, 1999 |
| 9. |
Shibata Y, Yamashita S, Masyakin VB, Panasyuk
GD, Nagataki S. 15 years after Chernobyl: new evidence of thyroid
cancer. 358: 1965-1966, 2001 |
| 10. |
Mahoney MC, Lawvere S, Falkner KL et al.
Thyroid cancer incidence trends in Belarus: examining the impact of
Chernobyl. Int J Epidemiology 33: 1025-1033, 2004 |
| 11. |
Cardis E, Kesminiene A, Ivanov V et al.
Risk of thyroid cancer after exposure of I-131 in childhood. J Natl
Cancer Inst. 97: 727-732, 2005 |
| 12. |
Pacini F, Vorontsova T, Demidchik EP et
al. Post-Chernobyl thyroid carcinoma in Belarus children and adolescents:
comparison with naturally occurring thyroid carcinoma in Italy and
France. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82: 3563-3569, 1997 |
| 13. |
Demidchik YE, Demidchik EP, Reiners C,
Biko J, Mine M, Saenko VA, Yamashita S. Comprehensive clinical assessment
of 740 cases of surgically treated thyroid cancer in children of Belarus.
Ann Surg, in press, April, 2006 |
| 14. |
Moysich K, Menezes R, Michalek A. Chernobyl-related
ionizing radiation exposure and cancer risk: an epidemiological review.
Lancet Oncol 5: 269-279, 2002 |
| 15. |
Ivanov VK, Gorski AI, Maksiutov
MA et al. Thyroid cancer incidence among adolescents and adults in
Bryansk region of Russia following the Chernobyl accident. Health
Phys 84: 46-60, 2003 |
| 16. |
Yamashita S, Shibata Y (eds).
Chernobyl. A Decade. Excerpta Medica, ICS 1156, Amsterdam, pp 613,
1997 |
| 17. |
Yamashita S, Shibata Y, Hoshi M, Fujimura
K (eds). Chernobyl: Message for the 21st Century. Excerpta Medica
ICS 1234, Amsterdam, pp354, 2001 |
| 18. |
Kodama Y, Asai N, Kawai K, Jijiwa M, Murakumo
Y, Ichihara M, Takahashi M. The RET proto-ongogene: a molecular therapeutic
target in thyroid cancer. Cancer Sci 96: 143-148, 2005 |
| 19. |
Rabes H, Demidchik EP, Sidorov JD, Lengfelder E, Beimfohr
C, Hoelzel D, Klugbauer S. Pattern of radiation-induced RET and NTRK1
rearrangements in 191 post-Chernobyl papillary thyroid carcinomas:
biological, phenotypic and clinical implication. Clin Cancer Res 6:
1093-1103, 2000 |
| 20. |
Ciampi R, Knauf JA, Kerier R et al. Oncogenic AKFP0-BRAF
fusion is a novel mechanism of MAPK pathway activation in thyroid
cancer. J Clin Invest 115: 94-101, 2005 |
| 21. |
Kumagai A, Namba H, Saenko VA et al. Low frequency
of BRAFT1796A mutations in childhood thyroid carcinomas. J Clin Endocrinol
Metab 89: 4280-4284, 2004 |
| 22. |
Lima J, Trovisco V, Soares P et al. BRAF mutations
are not a major event in post-Chernobyl childhood thyroid carcinomas.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89: 4267-4271, 2004 |
| 23. |
Xing M. BRAF mutation in thyroid cancer. Endocr Relat
Cancer 12: 245-262, 2005 |
| 24. |
Detours V, Wattel S, Venet D, et al. Absence of a specific
radiation signature in post-Chernobyl thyroid cancers. British J Cancer
92: 1545-1552, 2005 |
| 25. |
Rogounovitch TI, Saenko VA, Ashizawa K, Sedliarou
IA, Namba H et al. TP53 codon 72 polymorphism in radiation-associated
human papillary thyroid cancer. Oncol Rep, in press, 2006 |
| 26. |
Nakamura N. A hypothesis: radiation-related leukaemia
is mainly attributable to the small number of people who carry pre-existing
clonally expanded preleukemic cells. Radiat Res 163: 258-265, 2005 |
| 27. |
http://www.chernobyltissuebank.com/ |
| 28. |
Cardis E, Howe G, Ron E et al. Cancer consequences
of the Chernobyl accidents: 20 years on. J Radiol Prot 26: 127-140,
2006 |
| 29. |
Schneider AB, Sarne DH. Long-term risks for thyroid
cancer and other neoplasms after exposure of radiation. Nature Clin
Pract End Metab 1: 82-91, 2005 |
| 30. |
Imaizumi M, Usa T, Tominaga T et al. Radiation dose-response
for thyroid nodules and autoimmune thyroid diseases in Hiroshima and
Nagasaki Atomic Bomb Survivors 55-58 years after radiation exposure.
JAMA 295: 1011-1022, 2006 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Address: Chernobyl beyond 20 years and thyroid cancer |
|
|
 |
|